Opinion/Review: Different Fish and Game Websites, Northwest Edition



The Many Departments of Fish and Game

Hello and welcome.  I talk about fishing quite a bit in my blog and YouTube channel, and I reference Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) quite a bit.  Since not all Department of Fish and Game are the same, I thought to do a comparative analysis and review of the Departments of Fish and Game (or equivalent title).  With my love of fishing, this will expand to other regions around the US as well.


The sites covered in this one are:

Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG):  Home Page, Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW):  Home | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW):  Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (myodfw.com)


This blog post will focus on the Great Northwest states of Washington, Oregon, and Alaska.  The goal of this blog series is to compare/contrast and give a generally opinionated review of each of their sites.  I will discuss the following aspects of each site:

** General layout and appearance

** Navigation through the page, namely to locate:

        -- Fishing Regulations

        -- Publication of Emergency Orders

        -- Access to, and details of, data involving lakes and streams

** Storefront

        -- Ability to buy permits and tags online

        -- Price Cost


Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG)


I shall begin with the great state of Alaska.  Alaska is home to many different species of fish and even more in different biomes that aren't normally found in the continental US (aka the lower 48).  Since I live in Alaska and use this site as a frequent resource when outdoors, this shall be my baseline.

General Layout seems narrow, which is good and bad in a sense.  It is good for multi-device use (i'll get to that), but bad for the PC because it seemed condensed.  Other than that, everything else from all of the other categories is on big links or buttons on the main page.  The front page is more than a landing page, but a dashboard for the rest of the site.  The menus at the top are easily understandable.  The central highlights, news, and other links are crowded to a degree.  There is also a built-in search engin on the page in the upper right.



Navigating to all the important information is easy to a degree.  From the main page, there are large buttons to navigate to the Regulations and EOs on the right.  The bar at the top remains the same as you navigate through the menus for hunting and various kinds of fishing - as there are multiple types of fishing in Alaska.  The top bar is by broad category, which I will outline next.

The biggest hurdle is you have to know what or where you're looking for on a broad scope.  The top bar is For example, if I'm trying to navigate to Lake Data, I've got to understand that lakes fall in the broad category of Sport Fishing and not Commercial Fishing or Subsistence Fishing.

After several years of using this site as a resource, a critique/hurdle I could see bogging down the user is the page's attempt to be multi-platform.  Compare/contrast point is that the other sites utilize a version of GIS to display map data, however ADFG uses Google's version of GIS to display.  

There is also a simple version that displays the lakes and the bathymetric and basic information about the lake.



One great thing, especially when it comes to lake data in particular, is the broad category hurdle is easily overcome once you know what your looking for.  For example, clicking on Sport Fishing main page gives me a new page with a bar on the left about EVERYTHING on the subject regarding Sport Fishing info on ADFG.  Lake Data, Fish Counts, Hatchery Information, Stocking Locations, etc. is on the left and it breaks down in a tree-like manner.


The Storefront can be a bit tricky.  First, I strongly recommend having an account, however there are guest checkout options for certain purchases.  Having an account keeps track of previous orders, easy access to renew licensing, and other quick options from an account dashboard.

ADFG Store Page:  Store Sections - State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game Online Store

The Store itself, like the rest of the site, is by broad category.  You need to know your broad category (which if you've reached the Store's main page it is most likely you do).  

Costs are moderate in my opinion (with little XP hunting and fishing in WA, and none in OR or ID), as listed below.  


An extended version of the Fee Page for ADFG can be found here:  License, Stamp, and Tag Pricing List, Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Best thing, unless it's a special circumstance (see below), ALL purchases can be done via the web / your smartphone and you can receive your licenses / tags via email - for those sticky situations that may or may not require a Wildlife Trooper (State Trooper specific to DNR and Wildlife Management)

The biggest upside to me, being a disabled Veteran, is the ADFG supports Vets and offers lifetime Sport Fishing with Salmon Stamp for free.  There is also a low income option for fishing and hunting tags.  Obviously, all of these options have paperwork requirements and you will need to contact the ADFG office via email/phone for more details.


Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)


General Layout is similar to ADFG, however the stark contrast is obvious.  There front page is "large and in charge" to put it mildly.  I brought the site up on my phone and it gave me the same experience - it did not translate well.  However, it also isn't cluttered, with large and clean buttons in the middle of the page (once you scroll - again, size/scaling) that are clear and concise and a bit less broad than ADFG.  There is also a bar at the top of the page, but are only links and does not provide a dropdown feature.

        The top bar

         The middle pane buttons


After navigating around a bit, I found the top bar buttons and the middle pane buttons ARE THE SAME THAT GO TO THE SAME PAGE.  Swipe right/left concept.  Drilling down into the buttons, there a categories in an orderly fashion, however there are also links to pages that tend to fall out of scope in my opinion - such as animal science and behavior, conservation, etc.  

To breakdown each page, there are the useful links, followed by News and Important Dates on the subject, and below that at the bottom are Conservation News and Tips on the same broad category.  This is also how you access the store front for that particular category.

The absolutely biggest critique that I have about navigating the WDFW pages is the amount of drill down I have to do to reach the Emergency Orders, and even then the Orders are too specific to that subject.  There is no broad category "here are the Emergency Orders for the whole state" kind of thing.  I find that useful to know the region or state's entire EO list to spread the word to my friends and family.  As an example to this, I clicked on the Fishing and Shellfish button, which took me to the main fishing page.  Only in "Fishing Regulations" page did I find any links to the Emergency Orders.

On another note, I attempted to navigate around the WDFW Lake Databases and gather information about lakes.  I used Lake Chelan as a target lake for the navigation test.  Under the "Places to Go Fishing" link, I had to choose between "lowland lakes" and "highland lakes" - I imagine this is the difference between fishing IN the Cascades and NOT IN the Cascades.  I clicked lowland lakes and it took me to a Database Search Engine where I could type the Lake's name.  There are also drop downs to narrow down county and area also.  Clicking Lake Chelan link in the pic below took me to a very wordy, and very link heavy, description of the lake with links going to other places.  There are no separate bathymetric maps, as it is embedded in the USGS GIS navigational map on the below site.  


                    (Pics above courtesy of WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife)


When attempting to navigate to other aspects of the Fishing section, I encountered quite a bit of drill down through links to find anything.  It seems like the page wants me to stay there and click on this, or click on that, with several clicks before I finally get to where I'm going.

The Store is easy to get to.... there are links on almost every page EXCEPT THE MAIN PAGE to "buy a license" or "purchase a permit" and similar buttons throughout the page.  However, like the EO, you will need to drill down at least 1-2 levels before these store buttons show up.

The Store requires a login to do any sort of actual purchases, however in the Store Login upper right corner is a "License Information" button that takes you to various FAQs about licensing and such.  This is where you will find the very cluttered and complicated Fees Page.  The link to the Fees Page is below.  

The biggest known difference is that WA does not provide any free anything - every outdoor activity, whether it be hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, etc. - has a fee, and the fee is dependent on how old you are.

WDFW Fee Table:  WDFW Wild System - Help & Support (wa.gov)



Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife


From a general appearance/first glance, it has a similar layout to the WDFW front page.  There is a "category bar" that takes you to different subsets, with similar larger, illustrated buttons at the bottom of the main page, and between them are very large banners with text and links about a variety of special topics and the banner's illustration shows semi-pro people flexing with their catch.

Flipping through the categories, again, there are large illustrations/photos of the activity in question - fishing, crabbing/clamming, hunting, etc. with text and links either on the pic or in between.  The large pics are my only downside when it comes to general layout and appearance - as it makes you scroll... a lot.  This has a "blog" feel to it instead of other formats, referring to links and pages as "articles"

One category that jumped out at me - a blessing and a curse in this scenario - is the Recreational Report section, which gives just that.  Again, it has a blog-like feel to it, but it does provide pertinent information and tips/tricks for the activity that looks promising and helpful.  If I were to fish in Oregon, I would check this out.

Each of the categories have a collection of important buttons about that category, which take you to said important.  Despite the almost monitor-sized banner, one quick swipe or scroll takes you to pertinent info links - I don't have to hunt them.  An example is the Fishing page below


One more thing that I like about this site, even more so than Alaska's site, is the quick access to regulations and pertinent information.  WDFW makes you drill down through their site a lot - which is not fun when i'm looking for particular info while out on the water.  

However, after cruising through the site for a bit, I could not locate Emergency Orders without using the Search function at the top of the page, which was only a magnifying glass - no embedded search bar.  I found something similar, which ODFW calls "Announcements" and "Regulation Updates" which can be found scattered throughout the "Recreational Report" category from the main page.

As far as lake data, ODFW only supplies a basic stocking report and land use report.  The concept appears to be a stripped variant of GIS data overlaid on a simplified Google Maps.  

I was not able to locate any geolocation, metro, or bathymetric data for stocked or wild waters on the ODFW website.  When using the Stocking Location tool, I found very basic information, as depicted below.





When it comes to shopping on the site, the front page to the Shop was kind of difficult to locate.  There is a link in the upper right corner of the page "Buy License" which is a built in redirect to another site, similar to the other two sites - a login wall.  This experience was very much like WA experience and semi-similar to AK experience navigating to the store. 


 The one big downfall to this is there was no overall, all encompassing "Fee Site."  To find the site with the list of all of Oregon's outdoors fees, I had to do a serious drilldown into the regulations, with two different redirects before I reached the entire list of Oregon's License, Tag, and Permit Fees.  You'll notice in the link below that I have strayed fairly far from the ODFW website.  At first glance, the site seemed part of ODFW until I read a bit deeper, finding its just a third party site.


After reviewing the fees, I found that the prices are fairly similar to that of AK, but definitely less expensive than WA.  The two big points that jumped out is the simplified grouping of the licensing costs, called "Combined Tags", with the second point being that the Non-Resident costs are considerably low compared to that of both WA and AK....  at least 33-50% cheaper.  

For example, in AK and WA, as a Non-Resident Veteran I would pay $100+ for my tags, however it is less than $50 in OR.  



Overall Compare/Contrast and Rating

Now that I've discussed each of the three sites, I will do a bit of compare/contrast and devise a rating scheme for them.

General Layout and Information

On the grounds of General Layout, I found the ADFG site more than a bit cluttered with links, and although the links made sense, it wasn't easily digestable.  As I moved "down the coast" - AK to WA to OR, I found significantly less links on the main page and more artwork, photos, and similar "outdoor motivational propaganda."  

I also found the second- and third-level layouts in the same manner.  ADFG had a lot of data, a lot of links, and I didn't have to drill down beyond a second or third layer to find it. WDFW had quite a bit of drill down, but still maintained my expectation of data that I would expect from a Fish and Game site.  ODFW kind of seemed like a promotional ad, having the least amount of data available on their site.  The one good thing ODFW had that WDFW and ADFG didn't have was a Reports page that had the feel of walking in to the Sporting Store and seeing the whiteboard with the reports of all the lakes and rivers on it - the 5 w's of fishing, trapping, etc.

One other point to mention is that each site had their "niche" subject and the sites had a good amount of information and resources on them regarding their respective "niche" - AK being Salmon, WA being Game Hunting, and OR being coastal resources like clams and crabs.

General Layout (out of 5)

ADFG = 4.   It would have a higher score if there weren't so many links

WDFW = 3.  The large banners and having to drill down several levels and having to hunt for data wasn't fun.

ODFW = 2.  The information was there, but I really really had to hunt it down.


Navigation and Information (out of 5)

ADFG = 5.   The sidebar tree expansion helped and the information was there.  The simplistic streamline and collection of data was great.  Easy access to Bathymetric data of lakes with simple directions to reach them.  Stocking data was an easy database to manipulate.

WDFW = 3.  The links to the pertinent data was there, even if it was laid over a big distracting banner.  Having to drill down beyond two links was a pain.  The Bathymetric data was there, albeit embedded in a small Google Maps like window.  The Lakes Database was good, so long as you knew if you were "highland" or "lowland" as was the Stocking Database navigation.

ODFW = 2.  This felt like a blog or an advertisement site as I navigate through.  Outside of the "Recreation Report" I could not find written or pictorial information about the lakes and rivers.  A lot of the information was tucked away inside downloadable PDF files.  The Stocking Database was the only good aspect of such, but it was integrated into the Lake Database, which was an okay experience.


Shopping Experience / Purchasing Licenses and Tags

Once again, this was a harrowing experience.  Each of the sites had a "wall" - you need to have an account to buy tags and licenses, and as expected, you need to be a resident to make an account.  That said, each of the sites did have their "Guest Services" available and their non-resident fees posted.  Below will be my rated opinion of the shopping experience.

Shopping (out of 5)

ADFG = 4.  Non-resident fees are moderate compared to some other states back east.  I could view the whole list of fees easily on one readable page without downloads.  Fee breakdown followed the expected scheme without being overcomplicated.

WDFW = 3.  Again, the WDFW is overcomplicated, and I rated that appropriately.  The fee page was easier to navigate to, but if I wasn't paying attention I would have never found it.  The Fee list is comprehensive, but doesn't need to be so finite - a lot of it could be grouped together.

ODFW = 3.  I want to rate this as a 2, but due to the low non-resident fees, I'll rate it as a 3.  The Fee list was handled by a not-so-obvious third party system and difficult to find.  The Fees overall were lower than expected, but of the three states, it was all but impossible to find any info on Veteran Fees or any relations to Military Veterans at all.


Conclusion

Overall, I am glad that I now live in Alaska.  The use of the ADFG website supports this aspect, although taking it from an analytic point, there page was very cluttered.  I personally would take cluttered information over large photos of people flexing with fish or big game and little to no information at all.

Since you made it this far, I hope you enjoyed my analysis.  I'm interested to know your thoughts, so please leave some kind of feedback.  I want to do more of these, but i'm not sure what direction to go from WA/OR region.  I only want to cover three states at a time that share a relative region with each other.  Thoughts???

Thanks for reading :) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FISH AND GAME WEBSITE LINKS, ALL 50 STATES

Fishing in AK: the Hooligan

Random Word: Discombobulated